TAX POLICY BASICS

DOLLARS AND SENSE: MICHIGAN TAXES MADE SIMPLE

Updated April 2026 | Nicholas Hess, Fiscal Policy Analyst

    • State and local tax collection estimates determined during the Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference (CREC) establish a baseline budget for legislative negotiations.
    • Michigan has a variety of revenue sources, but despite recent improvements, its structure is still somewhat regressive, asking more of households with low to moderate incomes and maintaining or worsening racial inequities.

In fiscal year (FY) 2023-2024, Michigan collected approximately $41.5 billion in tax revenue, which is on par with how much revenue was collected the prior year ($39.5 billion).[1] The largest revenue sources include the individual income tax (32.5%) as well as sales and use taxes (30.8%). The vast majority of state revenue supports the General Fund/General Purpose (GF/GP), the state’s main operating fund not dedicated to a particular purpose, as well as the School Aid Fund (SAF), which provides the majority of state funding for schools.

Twice a year, in January and May, the House Fiscal Agency, the Senate Fiscal Agency and the Treasury meet to forecast GF/GP and SAF revenue during the Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference (CREC). This biannual meeting is important for legislators because, as with most states, Michigan must balance its budget every year. The results of this meeting establish a baseline for anticipated revenue for state budgeting purposes.

The annual growth rate in the GF/GP tax revenue has had trouble keeping up with inflation for the last 20 years despite Michigan’s growing economy. However, in the last two years, the GF/GP revenue grew and matched GDP growth, but due to the state income tax trigger — which reduced the tax rate from 4.25% to 4.05% — Michigan collected less in revenue for 2023.[2] Although the GF/GP fund has exceeded $14 billion, inflation-adjusted revenue is below what it was in 2000.[3]

 

In addition to state taxes, households may also pay certain local taxes to support budgets for counties, cities, villages, and townships (CVT) and schools. Local governments are generally only authorized to collect property taxes which are set through ballot initiatives and establish millage rates to fund schools, libraries, fire departments and other local services. The state has also authorized certain counties to levy taxes on accommodations (hotel/motel stays) depending on population size.[4] In addition, cities are authorized to set local income tax rates and 24 cities in Michigan have done so.

Compared to many states, Michigan’s local governments are highly constrained in terms of the taxes they can levy; most municipalities are limited to property taxes. Apart from the unprecedented flow of federal aid in the wake of COVID-19, federal aid to localities has decreased, further hampering local control over their budgets.[5] Research shows Black and Hispanic homeowners tend to pay higher effective tax rates, making local governments’ reliance on property taxes just one aspect contributing to racial inequity in Michigan’s tax system.|6| CVTs that wish to address long-standing inequities are prevented by state statutes that stretch long back to the time of legal segregation.

The source of GF/GP revenue has shifted remarkably in the past two decades, largely as a result of 2011 tax changes. These changes greatly reduced the share paid by corporations, largely pushing the costs of government activities onto individuals to offset the reduced taxes on corporations. Originally, the 2011 tax reforms (Public Act 38) included eliminations of the $600 child deduction and the city income tax credit as well as reductions to the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Homestead Property Tax Credit, beneficial policies that help working families.

In 2023, the Michigan Legislature passed Public Act 4, which reversed some of the 2011 tax reforms, most notably increasing the state EITC to 30% of the federal ETIC from the 6% cap under the 2011 reforms.[7] The bipartisan EITC has been found to have a myriad of societal and economic benefits including, but not limited to, reducing poverty and promoting work.[8],[9] Although these changes are welcome, the majority of the GF/GP revenue is still shouldered by the income tax, with income taxes making up 68% on average in the last ten years, compared to the 50% on average in the ten years prior to 2011.[10] Before the 2011 tax reforms, approximately 20% of GF/GP revenue came from business taxes, but this has shrunk to less than 10%.

 

Analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy demonstrates how Michigan households with low incomes are paying more than their fair share. While the marginal tax rate is the same for everyone (for example, 4.25% for income or 6% for sales), the effective tax rate is the amount of tax paid as a share of income. In Michigan, the households earning the least pay a higher share of their income towards taxes than the top 1%.[11] These impacts amplify racial inequity due to the overrepresentation of Black, Hispanic and Indigenous households earning incomes in the bottom 20%.

The heavy reliance on sales and property taxes as well as a flat income tax means Michigan households in the lowest income quintile — earning less than $21,300 per year — pay an effective tax rate at 7.1% while the highest-earning households — those earning over $670,300 — spend the lowest at an effective rate of only 5.7%. We are able to reduce tax liabilities for families with low incomes, making our tax system fairer, with strong refundable tax credits like the EITC.

↑ Back to Top

[1] Review of How Much Tax Does the State Collect? 2024. State Budget Office. 2024. https://www.michigan.gov/budget/budget-offices/ofm/faq-pages/state-finances/how-much-tax-does-the-state-collect.

[2] Outline of the Michigan Tax System – 2023 – Citizens Research Council of Michigan.” 2023. Citizens Research Council of Michigan. July 11, 2023. https://crcmich.org/publications/outline-of-the-michigan-tax-system-2023.

[3] Cleary, Mary Ann, and Kevin Koorstra. 2024. Review of Budget Briefing: State Budget Overview. House Fiscal Agency. January 2024. https://www.house.mi.gov/hfa/PDF/Briefings/state_budget_overview_briefing_fy23-24.pdf.

[4] “Outline of the Michigan Tax System.” Citizens Research Council of Michigan, May 2021. https://crcmich.org/PUBLICAT/2020s/2021/Tax_Outline_2021.pdf.

[5] Tharpe, Wesley. “Easing State Restraints on Local Taxing Power Can Strengthen Democracy, Promote Prosperity and Equity.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. March 28, 2023. https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/easing-state-restraints-on-local-taxing-power-can-strengthen.

[6] “Advancing Racial Equity with State Tax Policy.” 2018. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. November 15, 2018. https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/advancing-racial-equity-with-state-tax-policy.

[7] Stegbauer, Alex, Jim Stansell, and Ben Gielczyk. 2023. Review of Legislative Analysis: Income Tax Act Changes. House Fiscal Agency. 2023. https://legislature.mi.gov/documents/2023-2024/billanalysis/House/pdf/2023-HLA-4001-92F63454.pdf. Stegbauer, Alex. 2023. Review of Legislative Snapshot: Three Tiered Treatment of Retirement Income. House Fiscal Agency. March 2023. https://www.house.mi.gov/hfa/PDF/FiscalSnapshot/Tax_Three_Tiered_Treatment_of_Retirement_Income_Mar2023.pdf.

[8] “Research Shows Long-Lasting Benefits of EITC.” Center for Law and Social Policy. October 1, 2017. https://www.clasp.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Research-shows-long-lasting-benefits-of-EITC-5.pdf.

[9] “Policy Basics: The Earned Income Tax Credit.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. April 28, 2023. https://www.cbpp.org/research/policy-basics-the-earned-income-tax-credit.

[10] “General Fund/General Purpose Revenue: FY 1978-79 To Estimated FY 2024-25.” Senate Fiscal Agency. June 25, 2024. https://sfa.senate.michigan.gov/Revenue/GFGPRevDollars.PDF.

[11] “Michigan: Who Pays? 7th Edition.” Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. January 9, 2024. https://itep.org/whopays/michigan-who-pays-7th-edition/.