TAX POLICY BASICS

DOLLARS AND SENSE: MICHIGAN TAXES MADE SIMPLE

    • State and local tax collection estimates determined during the Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference (CREC) establish a baseline budget for legislative negotiations.
    • Michigan has a variety of revenue sources, but its structure is highly regressive, asking more of households with low incomes and maintaining or worsening racial inequities.

 

In 2020, Michigan collected over $34 billion in revenue, with taxes alone accounting for roughly 80% of state revenue. The largest revenue sources include the individual income tax (31%) as well as sales and use taxes (28%). The vast majority of state revenue supports General Fund/General Purpose (GF/GP), the state’s main operating fund not dedicated to a particular purpose, and the School Aid Fund (SAF), which provides the majority of state funding for schools.[1]

Twice a year, in January and May, the House Fiscal Agency, the Senate Fiscal Agency and the Treasury meet to forecast GF/GP and SAF revenue during the Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference (CREC). This biannual meeting is important for legislators because, as with most states, Michigan must balance its budget every year. The results of this meeting establish a baseline for anticipated revenue for state budgeting purposes.[2]

Over the past 15 years, revenue collections have failed to keep up with inflation, in large part due to policy decisions constraining growth.[3] Despite Michigan’s consistent economic growth—as measured by gross domestic product (GDP)—in the last decade, revenue losses prevent the state from investing in areas like schools and infrastructure.

 

In addition to state taxes, households may also pay certain local taxes to support budgets for cities, villages and townships. Local governments are generally only authorized to collect property taxes, set through ballot initiatives establishing millage rates to fund schools, libraries, fire departments and other local services. The state has also authorized certain counties to levy taxes on accommodations (hotel/motel stays) depending on population size.[4] In addition, cities are authorized to set local income tax rates, something 24 cities throughout the state have opted for.[5]

Compared to many states, Michigan’s local governments are highly constrained in terms of the taxes they can levy–most municipalities are limited to property taxes. Research shows Black and Hispanic homeowners tend to pay higher effective tax rates, making local governments’ reliance on property taxes just one aspect contributing to racial inequity in Michigan’s tax system.[6]

 

The source of GF/GP revenue has shifted remarkably in the past two decades, largely as a result of 2011 tax changes. These changes greatly reduced the share paid by corporations, largely pushing the costs of government activities onto individuals through the reduction or elimination of personal credits and exemptions.

Some of the changes include the elimination of the $600 child deduction, a reduction of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) from 20% to 6%, a decrease in the Homestead Property Tax Credit, and an end to the city income tax credit.[7] As a result, individual income taxes made up 70% of GF/GP revenue in the past five years on average, compared to only 50% in the five years predating the shift.

 

Analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy demonstrates how Michigan households with low incomes are paying more than their fair share. While the marginal tax rate is the same for everyone (for example, 4.25% for income or 6% for sales), the effective tax rate is the amount of tax paid as a share of income. In Michigan, the households earning the least are paying the highest effective tax rate. These impacts amplify racial inequity due to the overrepresentation of Black, Hispanic and Indigenous households earning incomes in the bottom 20%.

The heavy reliance on sales and property taxes as well as a flat income tax means Michigan households in the lowest income quintile—earning less than $17,600 per year—pay the highest effective tax rate at 10.4% while the highest-earning households—those earning over $422,100—spend the lowest at an effective rate of only 6.2%.[8]

 

Throughout these fact sheets, our policy recommendations will adhere to the following principles of good tax policy:

[1] “State Source and Distribution.” House Fiscal Agency, August 2021. https://www.house.mi.gov/hfa/PDF/RevenueForecast/Source_and_Distribution_Aug2021.pdf.

[2] The Management and Budget Act, Act 431 (1984). http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Act-431-of-1984.pdf.

[3] Elizabeth Pratt and David Zin. “General Fund/General Purpose Revenue Growth.” State Notes. Senate Fiscal Agency, Spring 2017. https://www.senate.michigan.gov/sfa/Publications/Notes/2017Notes/NotesSpr17lpdz.pdf.

[4] “Outline of the Michigan Tax System.” Citizens Research Council of Michigan, May 2021. https://crcmich.org/PUBLICAT/2020s/2021/Tax_Outline_2021.pdf.

[5] Michigan Department of Treasury. “What Cities Impose an Income Tax?,” 2021. https://www.michigan.gov/taxes/0,4676,7-238-75545_43715-153955–,00.html.

[6] Michael Leachman, Michael Mitchell, Nicholas Johnson      and Erica Williams. “Advancing Racial Equity with State Tax Policy.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, November 15, 2018. https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/advancing-racial-equity-with-state-tax-policy.

[7] “A Summary of House Bills 4361 & 4362 as Introduced 3-1-11.” Legislative Analysis. House Fiscal Agency, March 8, 2011. https://www.house.mi.gov/hfa/archives/pdf/summaries/11h4361_4362s2.pdf.

[8] “Who Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax Systems in All 50 States.” Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, 2018. https://itep.org/whopays/.