light-blue-header

Introduction: What they’ll inherit

One of the biggest responsibilities we all share as a state is to create a bright future where children can thrive.

The decisions we make today and the policies we adopt don’t just impact our world now, they determine what kind of world we are building for our kids.

Before we know it, the kids growing up in Michigan today will be our bus drivers, our doctors, our store managers and – if we’re lucky – our leaders. It’s up to us to ensure they get there.

A 2023 Detroit Regional Chamber survey asked 600 young adults ages 18 to 29 what would make Michigan a better place for them to live and work. The top responses included better infrastructure, better wages, and more affordable housing.¹ It’s time we listen.

A bright future for Michigan will include belonging for all kids and their families. It will offer family economic security, so young people are entering a robust job market where they earn fair wages and can afford to have their needs met.

This future will include a world-class education system that prepares all students to pursue meaningful careers. It will have access to health care for them and their loved ones. And perhaps most importantly, this future Michigan will provide thriving families and communities for kids to grow up in.

We have the power to build the world we want for our children.

A pro-kid agenda cannot focus only on home and school. Just like adults, kids are impacted by policy decisions in all areas of their lives – from water safety and transportation infrastructure to worker rights and health care access.

Policies addressing these and other needs have both short-term benefits and, in many cases, a positive return on investment for society in the long-term through lower poverty rates and higher levels of well-being. So as we invest in a world for kids growing up in Michigan today, we need to ask ourselves:

What kind of future will they inherit?

The Value of Data

As part of a national effort to measure the well-being of children at the state and local level, we at Kids Count in Michigan believe good policies are based on good evidence. But right now our public data sources are under threat.

Thousands of federal datasets exist to support research and policymaking on all manner of issues. For Kids Count in Michigan, these include the American Community Survey, the National Assessment for Educational Progress (sometimes called The Nation’s Report Card) and the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, among others.

The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, for example, was developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to support programs improving adolescent health. Data from the survey helped researchers identify the growing youth mental health crisis and, perhaps more importantly, the disparities among students with LGBTQ+ identities. Compared to heterosexual and cisgender students, LGBTQ+ students were more likely to report feeling unsafe at school, being bullied or seriously considering suicide.

Schools have used this information to create and enforce anti-bullying policies and train staff to recognize and address bullying.² Failing to collect and report on this information or attempting to hide the role of sexual orientation and gender identity will not eliminate the disparities, but rather will make it more difficult for schools to address them.

So far in 2025, some of the threats we have seen to federal data products include proposed cuts to statistical programs, the paring down of certain data collection, cancellations of contracts, decreases in staffing and the termination of advisory committees. At the same time, the Department of Government Efficiency is attempting to gain access to sensitive data for nonstatistical purposes. Unauthorized access will make it more difficult to collect quality information if it undermines trust in statistical agencies.

We at Kids Count in Michigan will continue working to advance access to trustworthy and reliable public data so advocates and decision-makers will have the information they need to create policies that help kids in Michigan thrive.

A note on disaggregated data

Data disaggregation by race and ethnicity is critical to identifying pressing social concerns and developing effective, equitable policy solutions. The League strives to be as explicit as possible when discussing race and ethnicity, but often a lack of disaggregated data prevents us from knowing one’s identity. Many data sources omit certain races and ethnicities or collapse them into an “Other” category.

This renders these groups invisible and masks notable economic, social and health disparities both between and within them. This affects American Indians/Alaska Natives, Asians, people of Middle Eastern and North African descent, and Pacific Islanders and Native Hawaiians in particular. Throughout this report and as standard practice, we present disaggregated data whenever it is available, and we continue to advocate for disaggregation to the greatest extent possible by data collection and research entities.

Kids Count in Michigan Data Sources

Kids Count in Michigan collects data from multiple primary sources, considering their reliability, collection schedule, availability at the local level and validity. Data in the 2025 Data Book and data profiles are mostly from the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, Michigan’s Center for Educational Performance and Information, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Michigan Department of Education, Early Childhood Investment Corporation, Feeding America and United for ALICE.

How the League uses language

To reflect the evolution of language and varied preferences among different communities, generations, cultures and regions, the League alternates between a variety of terms, including person-first and identity-first language as well as binary and non-binary language. In referencing specific data, the League uses the exact terminology from the original source.

Readers can explore information on these terms at www.mlpp.org/language.

End Notes

1 “Michigan Residents Under The Age of 30 Years Old.” Glengariff Group, Inc, August 2023. https://www.detroitchamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/FINAL_Glengariff-Group_DRC-BLM_Michigan-Residents-Under-30-Survey.pdf.

2 Michael F. Rice. “LGBTQ+ Students: Protections and Supports Memorandum.” Michigan Department of Education, February 13, 2025. https://www.michigan.gov/mde/-/media/Project/Websites/mde/Memos/2025/02/LGBTQ-Student-Guidance-Memo.pdf.