THE STAKES ARE HIGH FOR MICHIGAN

The OBBBA makes the individual income tax cuts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 permanent, including expanding many of the costly deductions of the TCJA such as the standard deduction, the alternative minimum tax, as well as huge deductions for certain business activity. The cap for deducting state and local taxes has been raised from $10,000 to $40,000, another tax deduction largely favoring high-income earners in high-income states.

However, the bill goes far beyond simply expanding the TCJA temporary tax provisions.

National Impact

According to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), 72% of the tax savings from the OBBBA goes to the top 20% of households, with less than 1% going to the bottom fifth of households. The average tax cut for the top 1% is $66,000 per year while the bottom 20% will see an average tax cut of $20. ITEP further estimates that should the trade war continue, the tariffs will more than offset the reduction of taxes for the bottom 40% of tax earners. 

This means that combined with the tariffs, the bottom 40% will actually end up paying more. The OBBB not only heavily favors high earners, but earners in states with no income tax will see, on average, a larger increase in after-tax savings. Furthermore, the tax benefits for pass-through businesses will continue, which will disproportionately favor the 1%.

  • OBBBA also restores expensive business deductions, such as deducting the full cost of equipment, deducting the cost of research and experimental projects, restoring interest deduction (making it less costly for businesses to issue debt instead of equity), and allowing businesses to deduct 100% of nonresidential property used for business purposes.
  • One of the more expensive provisions of the OBBBA is permanently extending the changes made to the alternative minimum tax (AMT) in the TCJA. The AMT was created to prevent high-earning taxpayers from avoiding too much tax liability. According to the Congressional Budget Office, if the TCJA provisions for the AMT expired, the AMT would have yielded $83 billion in 2026 and reach $112 billion in 2034. Right now, only 200,000 individuals pay the AMT, when over 5 million individuals before TCJA paid the AMT.
  • The OBBBA also capped deductions for tips and overtime pay but only before 2029 and only pertaining to qualified tips and qualified overtime, respectively. Additionally, only those with social security numbers are allowed to deduct qualified tips and overtime.
  • The OBBBA introduces so-called “Trump Accounts” which are essentially IRAs (not Roth IRAs since the contributions are not tax-exempt), with the only differences being: (1) that the U.S. Treasury makes a one-time $1,000 contribution to “qualifying” accounts; (2) local governments can also make contributions to these IRAs.
  • The OBBBA increases the maximum Child Tax Credit by $200. However, it also excludes up to 3 million children because the credit is only available to children who have at least one parent/guardian who has a Social Security number.
  • The OBBBA also undercuts public schools by providing tax credits to organizations that make donations to private schools (including religious institutions) who provide vouchers. The provisions will cost $5 billion per year. The OBBBA makes these credits especially generous relative to other “charitable” donations. Not only does this take money away from other charities (like food and health) but, as ITEP points out, acts as a tax shelter for wealthy individuals. The federal government is essentially subsidizing private school tuition.
  • The OBBBA also ends clean energy tax credits set out by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022. According to Climate Power, Michigan is home to the most alternative energy projects launched in the wake of the IRA, resulting in over $27 billion of investments and the creation of 26,352 jobs.
  • Similarly, electric vehicles have been buoyed by tax credits, but the OBBBA will end EV tax credits starting September 30, 2025. Since the auto industry is such a huge part of the Michigan economy, it will spell uncertainty for the industry and perhaps discourage investments into alternative energy.
  • The OBBBA permanently extends exemptions of the estate tax outlined in the TCJA. The estate tax does not apply for single filers with estates less than $15 million and joint filers with estates less than $30 million. Higher-income earners are disproportionately impacted by the estate tax. Extending these provisions contributes to wealth inequality.
  • Finally, OBBBA adds over $3 trillion to the nation’s debt from 2025-2034 and $12 trillion in the next 20 years. While there will be a short-term boost to GDP, the mid-to-long-term economic effects of OBBBA are actually negative compared to the baseline estimate, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Put simply, the bill is worse for long-term economic growth than if Congress had let the provisions of the TCJA expire. This is mostly due to higher interest rates, as a result of increased deficits and the ballooning federal debt stock.

Repercussions for Michigan

  • 69% of the tax savings would flow to the top 20% of households (making more than $133,800 per year), with less than 1% going to the bottom fifth.
  • On average, Michiganders will get a tax cut of $2,660, but this is heavily skewed to the top 20%. The top 1% in Michigan is projected to save on average $49,220 thanks to the OBBBA. In fact, as a percentage of their income, the top 5% of Michigan households will save 3.1%, compared to 0.2% for the bottom 20%. This is not to mention the impact the spending cuts and tariffs will have on the bottom 40% of Michigan households.
  • For the bottom 20% of households, the extra $20 can help pay for a full tank of gasoline, while the tax cut given to the top 1% of households of $49,220 can buy a brand new car.
  • Relative to just extending the temporary TCJA tax provisions, the bottom 20% of Michiganders will see an annual average tax increase of $60, the middle 20%, an average tax cut of $420, and the top 1% with an average tax cut of $24,850. Relative to just extending existing policy, 75% of the tax cuts would flow to the top 20% of Michigan taxpayers, while the bottom 20% would be the only group seeing a tax increase.
  • The aforementioned business tax breaks will impact Michigan’s revenue stream, particularly the ability for businesses to expense domestic research and experimental costs as well as qualified properties used along the production process. Since Michigan is “coupled” with these federal tax changes, these business tax exemptions will reduce the tax base.
  • Additionally, these numbers do not factor in the recent Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference (CREC) changes, thus Michigan will be able to utilize less money than previously forecasted.

 

 

Analysis provided by
Nicholas Hess, Tax Policy Analyst
Rachel Richards, Fiscal Policy and Government Relations Director