Our website is getting a fresh new look. While we put the finishing touches on the redesign, some pages or features may not work as expected. Thank you for your patience!  

 In Blog: Factually Speaking, Housing

On Monday morning, I sat in on a Zoom call that really drove home the importance of our work.

We brought together parents, food pantry leaders, a school food service director and a legal aid attorney to talk with reporters about what’s happening with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in Michigan. Julie Cassidy, the League’s senior policy analyst whose priority is food access, opened with the data, and it’s hard to hear.

Since the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” passed in July of last year, more than 167,000 Michiganders have lost their SNAP benefits. More than 53,000, or 1 in every 3 of those Michiganders, are children.

With Michigan’s unemployment rate barely moving since last summer (it’s still higher than the national average), the need for SNAP has certainly not decreased; these families are being pushed off because of red tape and heartless restrictions from the federal administration. And what we heard on Monday morning showed the potential impact.

Melissa Miles, a graduate student and mom of a 6-year-old in Hillsdale County, said there’s just not enough time in the day to keep up with everything the new rules require. They change faster than she can track them. Colleen Sadows, a parent and graduate student in Washtenaw County, described being right on the edge of eligibility. If she picks up a little extra income, she loses SNAP, even if that income still falls short of a living wage.

Elly Jordan of the Michigan Poverty Law Program pointed out that these changes are hitting everyone on SNAP, including people with disabilities who are supposed to be exempt from work requirements. Shelters and domestic violence programs are now spending their own limited resources just helping residents keep up with paperwork. And Dan Gorman, who runs the food service department at Montague Area Public Schools, explained that his district qualifies for a federal provision that provides access to free school meals, but is dependent upon how many local families qualify for SNAP. As SNAP enrollment drops, schools lose that eligibility and the state has to pick up the extra cost.

And as we all know, food banks cannot possibly make up for the losses that this (preventable) crisis is causing. Greta Faworski from Kalamazoo Loaves and Fishes told us her pantry has seen a 56% jump in people asking for help. Last November, when the federal shutdown delayed SNAP benefits, they went from serving about 800 people a day to 1,200 a day. That meant adding staff and buying more food when shortages and rising prices made things even harder, especially in northern and rural counties where the percentage of children facing food insecurity is often over 20%.

Today, October 1, is the day that the federal administration is requiring states to begin paying a larger share of SNAP’s administrative costs. In Michigan, that adds up to $95 million this year alone. A year from now, that amount could rise to $400 million a year. Where will we come up with that money? It will mean cuts to something Michiganders need.

As Julie pointed out, though, Congress has an opportunity to turn this around for the people they serve. The Farm Bill is up for renewal, and our lawmakers can protect SNAP and delay these devastating cost shifts. Time is running out, so we hope you’ll contact your members of Congress and tell them to put Michigan kids first.

Recommended Posts