In Blog: Factually Speaking

A version of this column originally appeared in The Alpena News.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) serves 1.4 million Michiganders with the food they need to thrive and contributes $235 million to the state’s economy every month. But Republicans in Congress want to take this vital food assistance and other basic needs away from families struggling to make ends meet.

This year, Congress is renegotiating the Farm Bill, which authorizes SNAP spending. Recently, however, House Republicans dragged SNAP into the debt ceiling fight by passing a bill that conditions an increase on disastrous cuts to essential services like food assistance.

Adults aged 18 to 49 are limited to three months of SNAP in a three-year period unless they prove they’re working at least 80 hours per month. People with children in their homes and pregnant and disabled people are exempt from this. The time limit has been suspended during the pandemic, but will be reinstated on July 1.

The House-passed bill would extend the upper age limit to 55, applying the time limit to older adults who are more likely to have work-limiting health conditions and face age discrimination in the job market.

Taking food away does nothing to help people find jobs more quickly. Instead, it punishes many who are actually working, but struggle to cut through the red tape involved with documenting it.

Overwhelmingly, SNAP participants who can work, do. In fact, 75% of Michigan households that use SNAP include at least one working adult, and 1 in every 10 workers in our state feeds their family with food assistance benefits.

SNAP participants typically work in jobs with low wages that haven’t kept pace with the cost of living. From 2002 to 2017, there was no growth in wages for the most common jobs among SNAP participants, while wages for the most common “middle class” jobs grew by 8%.

Industries that frequently employ SNAP participants–such as agriculture and other sectors within the food system–also tend to have unpredictable schedules, high displacement and volatility. The time limit unfairly penalizes these workers for fluctuations in work hours, which are beyond their control.

This is the worst time to further restrict access to food assistance. Michigan SNAP caseloads continue to rise. Families just lost a portion of their grocery budget at the end of February, when a temporary boost in food assistance benefits ended. Since then, food insecurity has increased sharply among families that use SNAP.

Food banks and pantries are reporting continued increases in people seeking food, and long lines like those that dominated the headlines three years ago are becoming more common. The Food Bank Council of Michigan is seeing a spike in calls to their statewide food assistance helpline. In addition to food, callers are looking for increased help with rent, utilities and other basic needs.

Americans across the country know that a well-fed nation is a strong, healthy nation. Harsher time limits are deeply unpopular: recent polling from Data for Progress shows that 77% of likely voters want Congress to either maintain or increase SNAP funding. We need to tell our members of Congress to stop using SNAP as a bargaining chip in their reckless debt ceiling standoff and quit trying to take food away from people by adding more red tape.