In Blog: Factually Speaking

On April 29, I had the opportunity to attend the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry’s field hearing in East Lansing on the 2023 reauthorization of the Farm Bill. The committee is chaired by U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow and the hearing included input on our next Farm Bill from a diverse range of agricultural producers, food access advocates and stakeholders.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is one of the biggest pieces of the Farm Bill, making it vital legislation to address critical food needs for Michigan residents and kids. At the Michigan League for Public Policy, and on behalf of the people we fight for, we are so grateful for Sen. Stabenow’s continued leadership on the Farm Bill and her consistent support of its food assistance provisions. This includes the Senator’s advocacy around improvements to the Thrifty Food Plan that increased food benefits by around $37 per person.

SNAP promotes health and prevents hunger for 1.2 million Michiganders. This includes 1 in 5 children, 41,000 veterans and 10% of the overall workforce in our state. SNAP is an important nutritional support in both rural and urban communities, and SNAP’s benefits resonate in Northern Michigan in particular. Alcona County has one of the five highest county rates of SNAP use by families with children in the state at 29.4%, and nearby Ogemaw and Roscommon counties have the top two rates across Michigan, both exceeding 34%.

With SNAP’s impact on our state, it’s never too early to start thinking about the Farm Bill’s next reauthorization and what additional improvements can be made, and we appreciate having that conversation start right here in Michigan. As part of the hearing, the League also submitted written testimony outlining our policy priorities for the next Farm Bill to further improve Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program’s (SNAP) ability to respond effectively to food insecurity.

We are urging Congress to support eliminating SNAP’s three-month time limit for able-bodied adults without dependents. Studies have repeatedly shown that the time limit does not increase employment or earnings, but simply cuts off people from the benefits they need. In the absence of the ability to remove this limit entirely, please support the availability of hardship waivers from the limit for counties and metropolitan areas with high unemployment.

The League vigorously opposes any attempt in Congress to turn back the reforms of the Thrifty Food Plan, to mandate child support cooperation requirements or asset tests, or to impose any other harmful policy that would prevent otherwise eligible households from receiving benefits. We also want the next Farm Bill to ensure program operations and oversight keep pace with technology. The pandemic forced SNAP to adapt quickly to new circumstances. State application and certification systems must remain accessible and efficient by the smart use of technology.

Finally, we would like to see the federal government redesign SNAP performance measures to be more human-centered. SNAP’s current performance measurement system emphasizes preventing improper payments. States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have a rigorous measurement system in place for this critical work. Currently information is not available to policymakers or the public about how well SNAP is working in terms of the human experience of accessing benefits, such as equitable access and effective delivery.

As state budget negotiations continue, the League also would like to see our state policymakers make SNAP work better for families by investing in recruiting more retailers to accept online SNAP purchases and covering shoppers’ fees for home grocery delivery and curbside pickup. These measures would promote more equitable access to the healthy food we all need to thrive.

SNAP plays an important role in reducing hunger in Michigan. We appreciate Sen. Stabenow’s commitment to SNAP in the Farm Bill, and we hope policymakers at the state and federal level will join her in continuing to improve the program and make food access a bipartisan priority.